I would support the use of computer chips to a certain
degree if they were sold on the market. I think that this technology should be
taken advantage of in order to protect the ones we love; as long as they need
our protection. Pets, Alzheimer’s patients and young children would be
appropriate candidates for the product and promote success. These members of
the family need assistance and I feel that a tracker chip would make family’s
jobs in assisting them easier and create a lifestyle with safety for the chip’s
users. Although I do support the chip in this aspect, I would not agree with a
mandatory bill from congress requiring ID chips to be implemented in young
children. Every parent style is unique and I think it should be a parent’s
choice of whether or not to use the chip. Every parent has the right to set
their own rules for their young children. When it comes to those who are more
independent in the family, such as teens, I do not think that chips are
necessary. Teens need to be able to learn how to navigate the world for their
adult future and I think that computer tracking chips would hinder that
developing process. Because teens are capable of making decisions on their own,
I feel that ethics would be questioned if kids this age were required to have a
tracking chip because it is essentially an invasion of privacy.
I agree with your view on the implantation of chips in those who would benefit from extra safety measures. While responding on my own blog, I did not even think about the use of chips on pets, but I think this would make the most sense. I think beyond the realm of small children, pets and Alzheimer's patients, chips are incredibly invasive and should not be used. Also, your post was very well written. :)
ReplyDelete